Month: July 2018 (Page 1 of 2)

Final Thoughts

Summer is over! It is time to move on to the fall semester!

Overall, this research program was an entirely new experience to me. I enjoyed having control of my method and my work schedule, but too much freedom might’ve been a curse for me. I feel like I could have done more if I had started working with the same vigor that I had these past 3 weeks from the beginning. Alas, even Leonardo Di Vinci admitted to being a procrastinator.

Now that I know what I’m doing, I definitely plan to continue working on this project. I really learned to admire Janine’s skills with ArcGIS, and I would like to get better using the program. I might do a few tutorials on it and try to really get the hang of it. I want to add more states to my analyses and I would like to look at other characteristics. This is an interesting question, and I hope to further explore it.

I learned some new and valuable skills this summer. All of the technology will improve my research/class work (especially the text analyses!). I think this summer has worked to improve my overall workflow as well.

There’s really not too much to say other than I had a good summer filled with long nights and a lot of maps! I would recommend this program to other students!

Signing off–

A time for feedback

This week was feedback week, and after the discouraging news that none of our projects were ready for feedback on Tuesday, I spent this week editing my project and really thinking about it.

To be honest, I didn’t get that much feedback from the Bryn Mawr symposium. A lot of people said my project was cool, but they didn’t give me too much feedback that I can apply to my project. The most feedback I got was when I was working with ArcGIS with Janine and Carrie and they gave me tons of ideas of different ways to take my project. All of their suggestions were really great, and I think I will definitely use them.

I like the idea of doing case studies of different protests. I think that this new direction is something I can make a presentation on. I will have to work overtime to really get some work done. It’s unfortunate but I have been slacking off this summer. So to make up for lost time, its time for overdrive!!

I am going to really work on these case studies, but unfortunately, I’m not too sure how to do a case study. I will be asking a lot of questions this week on how much I’ll need to have a good case study.

This week is a big week! The final week! Hopefully everything will turn out great!!!

Another week, Another task

The fourth of July was lovely, I went home but unfortunately the internet was out! So, I didn’t end up doing nearly as much work as I would’ve liked to. But onwards and upwards! It’s time to start cracking down and finishing this project in (omg) two weeks…

So far, I’ve got a lot of details mapped out. I haven’t even started trying to compare them, and I hope tomorrow at our review I can get some input on how to best look at the data I’ve collected. I am adding transit routes to my map as I type. Arc GIS is a very sensitive program, and even when the files are correctly formatted they are often still difficult to use in the program. I wish someone would improve ArcGIS, for example: they should make organizing layers easier, they should accept excel files, and they should make other changes that improve user experience.

I hope to get as much feedback this week as possible so I can pull all nighters and work really hard on having a final product. I think I might be losing direction, but I’m working on getting that back. These next two weeks will be busy! But I am excited to get my hustle going!

This summer is going far too fast.

 

Facing challenges

One challenge of any idea, is figuring out how to get those ideas out of your head, and into a format that presents that idea the best way possible. One of the biggest challenges I have faced is finding technology that helps me accomplish specifically what I hoped to accomplish, and finding ways to apply technologies I know how to use in ways that overall benefit my project. The way I have overcome (or started to overcome) these challenges is partially with the help of Courtney, Carrie, and Jill who recommended technologies to use, and ways of using technologies in ways that are beneficial to my project. Another way I am tackling these challenges is by finding technologies that almost do what I would like them to do, and seeing if and how I can twist and push this technology to work for my project. Essentially, to face my challenges I asked for help, and I am finding technologies that I can push to be useful for my work.

Questions and Answers

The best year to create a comprehensive history of the Campus Theatre would have been 1941 — the year it opened. 77 years later and it’s a little more challenging.

5 weeks into the summer research and I seem to learn something new about the shape of my project every day. One of the questions I’m most frequently asked is how in-depth I could be getting while digitizing this cinema’s history. What facets of the history of the theater will receive the most attention? For a while it seemed like the only answer to this question was, “I’m not sure yet. I’m trying to figure it out by the end of the week.” After many of these weeks in digital scholarship limbo, I think I’ve come up with an answer.

As one might expect, an obstacle that I face on a day-to-day basis is finding data in archives and newspaper articles relevant to my research. What a project of this scale needs is time and though the eight weeks that the program affords might not be enough to cover the entire history of the Campus Theatre in as much depth as I’d like, it does allow for a more focused study into a smaller time frame of the theater’s history.

After giving it much thought, my research will now be focused on The Campus Theatre’s first five years of existence with special attention paid to its role in the war effort during World War II and  the implications of the programming at the time. In digitizing the first year of screenings at the Campus Theatre, one can see a trend in the type of films they began to show as the war escalated with more and more war-related films being shown subsequent to the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

In changing the scope I hope to use the tools and resources associated with digital scholarship to present and visualize a more meaningful set of data represented in these first five years than I could have done with the first seven decades of the theatre’s history in the allotted time frame. The goal of my research is now centered around more so discovering more about what types of films were being produced during this time period, what types of films were being sent to a small single-screen art deco theatre in central Pennsylvania and what this says about film production, distribution and exhibition during this period. My research will also present the types of things that the Campus Theatre did to assist the war effort. In its first year after its founding, it held many U.S.O. events and was an outlet where war bonds and stamps were sold.

As of now, I am excited to see what other information this period of time tells us about our history.

« Older posts